abaqus帮助文档之地震相应计算分析(2)
show the contour plots of the tensile damage variable, DAMAGET (or ), on the left, and the stiffness degradation variable, SDEG (or d), on the right. The tensile damage variable is a nondecreasing quantity associated with tensile failure of the material. On the other hand, the stiffness degradation variable can increase or decrease, reflecting the stiffness recovery effects associated with the opening/closing of cracks. Thus, assuming that there is no compressive damage (), the combination and at a given material point represents an open crack, whereas and represents a closed crack.
At time , damage has initiated at two locations: at the base of the dam on the upstream face and in the region near the stress concentration where the slope on the downstream face changes.
When the dam displaces toward the downstream direction at time , the damage at the base leads to the formation of a localized crack-like band of damaged elements. This crack propagates into the dam along the dam–foundation boundary. The nucleation of this crack is induced by the stress concentration in this area due to the infinitely rigid foundation. At this time, some partial tensile damage is also observed on several elements along the upstream face.
During the next large excursion in the upstream direction, at time , a localized band of damaged elements forms near the downstream change of slope. As this downstream crack propagates toward the upstream direction, it curves down due to the rocking motion of the top block of the dam. The crack at the base of the dam is closed at time by the compressive stresses in this region. This is easily verified by looking at the contour plot of SDEG at time , which clearly shows that the stiffness is recovered on this region, indicating that the crack is closed.
When the load is reversed, corresponding to the next excursion in the downstream direction at time , the downstream crack closes and the stiffness is recovered on that region. At this time tensile damage localizes on several elements along the upstream face, leading to the formation of a horizontal crack that propagates toward the downstream crack.
As the upper block of the dam oscillates back and forth during the remainder of the earthquake, the upstream and downstream cracks close and open in an alternate fashion. The dam retains its overall structural stability since both cracks are never under tensile stress during the earthquake. The distribution of tensile damage at the end of the earthquake is shown in Figure 2.1.15–8, at time . The contour plot of the stiffness degradation variable indicates that, except at the vicinity of the crack tips, all cracks are closed under compressive stresses and most of the stiffness is recovered. No compressive failure is observed during the simulation. The damage patterns predicted by Abaqus are consistent with those reported by other investigators. Abaqus/Explicit results
Figure 2.1.15–9 shows the distribution of tensile damage at the end of the Abaqus/Explicit simulation. Two major cracks develop during the earthquake, one at the base of the dam and the other at the downstream change of slope. If we compare these results with those from the analysis in Abaqus/Standard (see Figure 2.1.15–8 at time ), we find that Abaqus/Standard predicted additional damage localization zones on the upstream face of the dam. The differences between the results are due to the effect of the dam–reservoir hydrodynamic interactions, which are included in the Abaqus/Standard simulation via an added-mass user element and are ignored in Abaqus/Explicit. This is easily verified by running an Abaqus/Standard analysis without the added-mass user element. The results from this analysis, shown in Figure 2.1.15–10, are consistent with the Abaqus/Explicit results in Figure 2.1.15–9 and confirm that additional damage to the upstream wall occurs when the hydrodynamic interactions are taken into account.
Input files
Abaqus/Standard input files
1、Frequency analysis of the Koyna dam. *HEADING
KOYNA DAM: NATURAL FREQUENCY EXTRACTION Units - n, m, sec
*PREPRINT, MODEL=YES *NODE
1 , 0.00, 0.00 21, 70.00, 0.00 2401, 0.00, 66.50 2421, 19.25, 66.50 3601, 0.00, 91.75 3621, 16.17, 91.75 3801, 0.00, 103.00 3821, 14.80, 103.00 *NGEN, NSET=NBASE 1, 21
*NGEN, NSET=NMID 2401, 2421
*NGEN, NSET=NWL 3601, 3621
*NGEN, NSET=NTOP 3801, 3821
*NFILL, BIAS=1.05
NBASE, NMID, 24, 100 *NFILL, BIAS=0.92 NMID, NWL, 12, 100 *NFILL
NWL, NTOP, 2, 100
*ELEMENT, TYPE=CPS4R 1, 1, 2, 102, 101
*ELGEN, ELSET=DAM 1, 20, 1, 1, 38, 100, 100
*ELSET, ELSET=WDAM, GENERATE 1, 3501, 100
*SOLID SECTION, ELSET=DAM, MATERIAL=CONCRETE 1.0,
*MATERIAL, NAME=CONCRETE *ELASTIC
3.1027E+10, 0.2 *DENSITY 2643.0
*CONCRETE DAMAGED PLASTICITY
…… 此处隐藏:2746字,全部文档内容请下载后查看。喜欢就下载吧 ……相关推荐:
- [学前教育]MC9S12XS256RMV1 xs128芯片手册4
- [学前教育]安东尼语录经典语录
- [学前教育]e级gps控制测量技术设计书
- [学前教育]苏教版2022-2022学年八年级下学期期末
- [学前教育]装修公司推广 营销
- [学前教育]家政服务合同(完整版)
- [学前教育]湖北省2016届高三联考语文试题
- [学前教育]爱立信无涯学习系统LTE题库1-LTE基础知
- [学前教育]揭秘大众柴油车作弊软件原理
- [学前教育]人才流失原因及对策分析
- [学前教育]房屋建筑施工工程劳务分包合同
- [学前教育]国际贸易实务试卷A卷09.6
- [学前教育]校园废品回收活动计划方案书范文格
- [学前教育]电大成本会计试题及答案
- [学前教育]大学物理实验 华南理工出版社 绪论答案
- [学前教育]爱丁堡产后抑郁量表
- [学前教育]液压冲击的危害、产生原因与防止方法(
- [学前教育]学生工作总结高一学生期中考试总结_020
- [学前教育]人民医院医疗废物管理规章制度大全
- [学前教育]阳光维生素的巨大抗癌潜能阅读题答案.d
- 马云在云锋基金江苏论坛闭幕式的发言
- 试论小学体育教育中的心理健康教育-教
- 语文A版一年级下册《语文乐园一》教学
- 2021四川大学物理化学考研真题经验参考
- [人教A版]2015-2016学年高中数学 第二
- 终端网点销售返利协议书
- 江苏省2015年眼科学主治医师青光眼考试
- 2017年部编人教版八年级语文上册教案
- 十一中学七年级英语上册Unit7Howmuchar
- 以赛促教的创新性实验教学机制建设实践
- 平凉市崆峒区2015七年级下生物期末试题
- 琶洲(地块五)A、B塔楼1、2#塔吊基础
- 一级医院工作制度与人员岗位职责
- 2018北京西城区高三二模理科数学试题及
- 炒股密码线技术 - 图文
- 职高学生生涯发展辅导教案
- 语文人教版四年级上册8 世界地图引出的
- 最新最新人教版二年级上册全册数学教案
- 2017高考英语全国2卷精彩试题(有问题
- 普通心理学笔记




