The dilemma of survey nonresponse(3)
244J.Burkell/Library&InformationScienceResearch25(2003)239–263
levelsofnonresponseifitcanbearguedthattherespondentsarerepresentativeofthepopulation.Forexample,CookandThompson(2001)arguedthat,despitearesponserateofapproximately14%(Thompson,2000),theresultsofaWeb-basedLibQUAL+studycouldbegeneralizedtothelargerpopulationbecausetherespondentswereshownnottodiffersignificantlyfromthepopulationonvariousmeasuredvariables(Thompson,2000).TheapproachusedbyCookandThompsonisonestrategyfordealingwithnonresponse.Thenextsectionofthisarticlepresentsthisandothersuggestionsforaddressingthedilemmaofnonresponse.
3.Dealingwiththedilemmaofnonresponse
Asafirststrategyfordealingwithnonresponse,theresearchershouldaddresstheproblematthesourcebytakingadvantageofmethodologicalvariationsproventoreducenonresponse.Althoughtheseeffortsareimportant,inmostcasestheywillnotresultina100%responserate.Theresearcheristhereforeleftwiththeproblemofinterpretingsurveyresultsinthecontextofsomeremaininglevelofnonresponse.
Reportsofsurveyresultsshouldalwaysindicatethedegreetowhichinitiallyselectedrespondentsparticipateinthesurveybyreportingtheresponserate(responserate=1ànonresponserate).Thereareseveraldefinitionsofresponserate,whichdifferinthewaythatincompletesurveys,noncontacts,refusals,andotheroutcomesaretreated(AmericanAssociationforPublicOpinionResearch,2000).Thisarticleusesthe‘‘maximumresponserate’’definedbytheAmericanAssociationforPublicOpinionResearch:responserate=(completeresponses+partialresponses)/totalnumberintheeligiblesample.Whentheresponserateislessthan100%,theresearcherhasthreechoices:(1)ignorethenonresponse,preferablyonasubstantivebasis(e.g.,alowlevelofnonresponseordocumentedreasontobelievethatnonresponsewouldnotaffectresearchresults);(2)limitthesurveyconclusionsbasedontherateandpresumedimpactofnonresponse;or(3)attempttoassessand,ifnecessary,correctforthesamplingbiasintroducedbynonresponse.3.1.Addressingtheproblematthesource:Methodstoreducenonresponse
Themethodofsurveyadministrationisanimportantdeterminantofresponserates.Fourmethodsthatarewidelyusedinsurveysaremail,telephone,face-to-face,ande-mailadministration(somesurveysarealsodistributedbyfax,butthesearefew,andthemethodhasquicklybeensupplantedbye-mailadministration).SurveyshavealsobeendeliveredovertheWeb(e.g.,Perkins&Yuan,2001),butWebsurveysofprobabilitysamplesgenerallyrequirerecruitmentofrespondentsusingoneoftheothermeansofadministration(Couper,2000).Ofthefourmethodswidelyusedwhenarepresentativesampleisdesired,face-to-faceadministrationtendstoresultinthehighestresponserates(Hox&Deleeuw,1994),althoughthiseffectmaydifferacrossdemographicgroups(Krysan,Schuman,Scott,&Beatty,1994).Telephonesurveysdemonstratethenexthighestresponserates,followedbyregularmailandthene-mail(Hox&Deleeuw,1994;Kettleson,1995).
J.Burkell/Library&InformationScienceResearch25(2003)239–263245
Althoughresponseratesarelowestformailande-maildelivery,thesemethodsarealsotheleastexpensiveandthereforearewidelyusedinsurveyresearch.Dillman(2000)hasdevelopeda‘‘tailoreddesignmethod’’toreducetheerrorassociatedwithnonresponse(amongotherfactors)inmailande-mailsurveys.Hesuggestedthatsurveyresponsecanbemaximizedbythefollowing:(1)establishingtherespondent’strust,(2)increasingtheexpectedrewardsofparticipation,and(3)reducingthesocialcostsofparticipation.SomeofthespecificstrategiessuggestedbyDillmanarerelativelylow-costandsimpletoimplementinanysurvey.Thesestrategiesincludeprenotification,personalizedcoverletters,theuseofreminders,incentiveswiththeinvitationtoparticipate,andstamped,self-addressedenvelopesforthereturnofmailsurveys.Researchsuggeststhat,ofthesemethods,smallmonetaryincentives(i.e.,$1to$2)includedwiththeinitialsurveymailoutarethesinglemosteffectivestrategythatresearcherscanusetoincreaseresponserates(Church,1993;Fox,Crask,&Kim,1988;Gajraj,Faria,&Dickinson,1990;Helgesen,Voss,&Terpening,2002;Hopkins&Gullickson,1992;Singer,VanHoewyk,&Maher,2000).Meta-analysesofstudiesofmailsurveyresponserateshaveofferedsupportforthestrategiessuggestedbyDillman(Foxetal.,1988;Hopkins&Gullickson,1992;Yammarino,Skinner,&Childers,1991),indicatingthattheimpactofinterventionstoincreaseresponseratesisconsistentacrosspopulations(Green,Boser,&Hutchinson,1998).Hart(1998)usedmanyofDillman’ssuggestionsforasurveyoftherelationshipsbetweenworkrolesandinformationgatheringforcollegefacultyandachievedaresponserateof84%.
Inadditiontothesestrategies,researchersshouldconsiderselectingasmallerinitialsampleandconcentratingeffortsandresourcesonachievingahighresponserate(Wayne,1975–76).Researchersmaychoosetouseoneofthemoreexpensivemethodstocollectdatafromthesmallersample(e.g.,telephoneinterviews),theymaychoosetousemultiplemethodsinsolicitingresponse(Roselle&Neufeld,1998),ortheymayprovideincentivestothoseinvitedtoparticipate.Althoughasmallersamplelimitstheprecisionwithwhichresultscanbestated,thisdisadvantageisoffsetbythereductioninbiasassociatedwithanincreasedresponserate.3.2.Ignoringnonresponse
Whencanyousimplyignorenonresponse?Theshortanswer,correctinthemostabsolutesense,isnever.Althoughlowresponseratesdonotnecessarilycompromisesurveyresults(Keeteretal.,2000;Krosnick,1999,Visseretal.,1996),anylevelofnonresponsecouldbiasconclusions(Jones,1996).Therealproblemisthattheresearchercannotknowwhethernonresponseaffectssurveyconclusions,becausethisrequiresinformationaboutthediffer-encesbetweenrespondentsandnonrespondents.Nonetheless,someconditionscanjustifyignoringthenonresponse,andthefactorsthatshouldbetakenintoaccountareoutlinedinthissection.Researchersshouldnot,however,seethisasapanaceaordefaultstrategyfordealingwithnonresponse.Ignoringtheproblemisappropriateonlyinasmallproportionofcases,andtheresearchermustensurethattheuseofthestrategyisjustified.
相关推荐:
- [高等教育]公司协助某村精准扶贫工作总结.doc
- [高等教育]高二生物知识点总结(全)
- [高等教育]苏教版数学三年级下册《解决问题的策略
- [高等教育]仪器分析课程学习心得
- [高等教育]2017年五邑大学数学与计算科学学院333
- [高等教育]人教版七年级下册语文第四单元测试题(
- [高等教育]2018年秋七年级英语上册Unit7Howmuchar
- [高等教育]2017年八年级下数学教学工作小结
- [高等教育]湖南省怀化市2019届高三统一模拟考试(
- [高等教育]四年级下册科学_基础训练及答案教材
- [高等教育]城郊煤矿西风井管路伸缩器更换施工安全
- [高等教育]昆八中20182019学年度上学期期末考试
- [高等教育]项目部各类人员任命书
- [高等教育]上市公司经营水务产业的模式
- [高等教育]人教版高二化学第一学期第三章水溶液中
- [高等教育]【中考物理第一轮复习资料】四.压强与
- [高等教育]金坑水电站报废改建工程机电设备更新改
- [高等教育]高中生物教学工作计划简易版
- [高等教育]2017年西华大学攀枝花学院(联合办学)44
- [高等教育]最新整理超短爆笑英文小笑话大全
- 优秀教师继续教育学习心得体会
- 阳历到阴历的转换
- 留守儿童教育案例分析
- 华师17春秋学期《玩教具制作与环境布置
- 测速传感器新型安装装置的现场应用
- 人教版小学数学三年级下册第四单元
- 创业个人意向书
- 山东省潍坊市2012年高考仿真试题(三)
- [恒心][好卷速递]四川省成都外国语学校
- 多少人错把好转反应当成了病情加重处理
- 中外广播电视史复习资料整理
- 江苏省扬州市江都区宜陵镇中学2014-201
- 工程造价专业毕业实习报告
- 广西师范学院心理与教育统计
- aympkrq基于 - asp的博客网站设计与开
- 建筑业外出经营相关流程操作(营改增后
- 人治 德治 法治
- [精华篇]常识判断专项训练题库
- 中国共产党为什么要实行民主集中
- 小学数学第三册第一单元试卷(A、B、C




